1.
Bion, W.R.: Experiences in groups: and other papers. Tavistock, London (1961).
2.
Felten, P.: Transformative conversations: a guide to mentoring communities among colleagues in higher education. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2013).
3.
Levi, D.: Group dynamics for teams. SAGE, London (2014).
4.
Franz, T.M.: Group dynamics and team interventions [electronic resource]: understanding and improving team performance. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2012).
5.
Franz, T.M.: Group dynamics and team interventions: understanding and improving team performance. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA [etc.] (2012).
6.
Hess, U., Philippot, P.: Group dynamics and emotional expression [electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007).
7.
Hess, U., Philippot, P.: Group dynamics and emotional expression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007).
8.
Harris, M., Bick, E.: The individual in the group: on learning to work with the psychoanalytical method. In: The Tavistock model: papers on child development and psychoanalytic training. pp. 25–43. Published for the Harris Meltzer Trust by Karnac, London (1978).
9.
Hazell, C.: Negative K Culture. In: Imaginary groups. pp. 39–48. AuthorHouse, Bloomington, IN (2005).
10.
Forsyth, D.: Introduction. In: Group dynamics. pp. 1–27. Brooks/Cole, Wadsworth, Belmont, California (1999).
11.
Forsyth, D.: Crowds and collectives. In: Group dynamics. pp. 442–471. Brooks/Cole, Wadsworth, Belmont, California (1999).
12.
Hinshelwood, R.D.: What happens in groups. In: What happens in groups. pp. 65–75. Free Association Books, London (1987).
13.
Hoffman, D.M., Blasi, B., Ćulum, B., Dragšić, Ž., Ewen, A., Horta, H., Nokkala, T., Rios-Aguilar, C.: The methodological illumination of a blind spot: information and communication technology and international research team dynamics in a higher education research program. Higher Education. 67, 473–495 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9692-y.
14.
Stensaker, B.: Organizational identity as a concept for understanding university dynamics. Higher Education. 69, 103–115 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9763-8.
15.
Elliott, C.J., Reynolds, M.: Participative pedagogies, group work and the international classroom: an account of students’ and tutors’ experiences. Studies in Higher Education. 39, 307–320 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709492.
16.
McGarrah Sharp, M., Morris, M.A.: Virtual Empathy? Anxieties and Connections Teaching and Learning Pastoral Care Online. Teaching Theology & Religion. 17, 247–263 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/teth.12211.
17.
Smith, Regina O.: Trust in Online Collaborative Groups: A Constructivist Psychodynamic View. Adult Learning. 22, 19–23 (2011).
18.
Bolden, R., Gosling, J., O’Brien, A.: Citizens of the academic community? A societal perspective on leadership in UK higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 39, 754–770 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.754855.
19.
Moller, N.P., Rance, N.: The good, the bad and the uncertainty: Trainees’ perceptions of the personal development group. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 13, 282–289 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2012.754482.
20.
G.L. Schruijer, S., L. Curseu, P.: Looking at the gap between social psychological and psychodynamic perspectives on group dynamics historically. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 27, 232–245 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-08-2012-0121.
21.
Riordan DC: Being ordinary in extraordinary places: reflective practice of the total situation in a total institution. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy. 22, 196–217 (2008).
22.
Collinson, D., Tourish, D.: Teaching Leadership Critically: New Directions for Leadership Pedagogy. Academy of Management Learning & Education. 14, 576–594 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2014.0079.
23.
Schauppenlehner-Kloyber, E., Penker, M.: Managing group processes in transdisciplinary future studies: How to facilitate social learning and capacity building for self-organised action towards sustainable urban development? Futures. 65, 57–71 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.012.
24.
West, L., Fleming, T., Finnegan, F.: Connecting Bourdieu, Winnicott, and Honneth: Understanding the experiences of non-traditional learners through an interdisciplinary lens. Studies in the Education of Adults. 45, 119–134 (2013).
25.
Ecclestone, K., Rawdin, C.: Reinforcing the ‘diminished’ subject? The implications of the ‘vulnerability zeitgeist’ for well-being in educational settings. Cambridge Journal of Education. 46, 377–393 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1120707.
26.
Ecclestone, K., Brunila, K.: Governing emotionally vulnerable subjects and ‘therapisation’ of social justice. Pedagogy, Culture & Society. 23, 485–506 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1015152.
27.
Obholzer, A., Roberts, V.Z., Tavistock Clinic. Consulting to Institutions Workshop: The unconscious at work [electronic resource]: individual and organizational stress in the human services. Routledge, London (1994).
28.
Action research.
29.
Active Learning in Higher Education.
30.
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education.
31.
British journal of educational studies.
32.
The British journal of educational psychology.
33.
British journal of educational technology.
34.
Higher education.
35.
Higher Education Quarterly.
36.
Higher Education Review.
37.
Journal of Further and Higher Education.
38.
Practitioner Research in Higher Education.
39.
Teaching in Higher Education.
40.
DISCOVER (Resource Discovery Platform), http://lrweb.beds.ac.uk/discover.
41.
Education Databases, https://lrweb.beds.ac.uk/education/using/.